The product is the same. The bottleneck is not.
Which first-round problem are you solving? Vettika for founders, in-house recruiters, talent scouts, hiring managers and recruiting agencies — what changes for each, and the honest case for picking a different one.
Every page below describes the same mechanism — a live voice AI runs the first-round interview and hands back a transcript plus a report scored against your rubric. What differs is which hour of your week it gives back, and that difference is large enough that the pages are worth reading separately. Pick the row that describes your week.
Find your row
| You are | What is capping you | What changes |
|---|---|---|
| FoundersHiring 1–5 roles yourself, between shipping. | A week per role disappears into intro calls you cannot delegate. | Fifty first-rounds run without you; you read reports, not calendars. |
| In-house recruitersRunning a req load for one company. | Scheduling and repetitive intro calls eat most of the screening week. | Every applicant is screened day-of; you meet only who you chose. |
| Talent scouts & headhuntersPlacing on commission, usually solo. | Your ceiling is the number of screens you can personally run in a week. | The first round runs itself and hands back a scored transcript per candidate. |
| Hiring managersNot the recruiter, but you own the bar. | Onsite slots go to candidates a generic recruiter screen filtered wrong. | Candidates are scored against your rubric, per criterion, with the transcript. |
| Recruiting agenciesRunning desks against client SLAs. | Capacity is capped at the screens each recruiter can run. | Prepaid Interview Minutes across every desk — no per-seat subscription. |
The pages
- Vettika for founders — Reclaim a week per role
- Vettika for in-house recruiters — 3× your weekly screens
- Vettika for talent scouts & headhunters — Scale placements, not headcount
- Vettika for hiring managers — Bring your own rubric
- Vettika for recruiting agencies — 10× capacity per recruiter
When none of these is you
Two cases where a different page is the honest answer. If you are buying for a thousand-plus hires a year with procurement, SSO and a security review in the loop, start at enterprise. If you are still deciding whether this category is worth buying at all, the comparison hub says plainly where a competitor is the better choice — including the cases where it is.
One thing every row should read first
From Greenhouse's 2026 Candidate AI Interview Report: 38% of US candidates have withdrawn from a hiring process because it included an AI interview — driven by pre-recorded, AI-scored video with no human present, and by not being told upfront. Whichever role you are in, the format and the disclosure are the difference between a pipeline and a leak. The standards we hold ourselves to exist because of that number, and how we measure it is published.
Run one and judge the output
Define a rubric, send one invite, read the scored report. The fastest way to know whether any of this applies to your week.